In any case there have been a number of considerations to be considered over time - not the least of which concerns style. Part of the point of doing this is to create "a simplified card, in which the art does not influence the meaning" of each card. I note that in quotes, because if I had a mission statement, that would be it. But that brings up the point of "how much background" do you put in a card? Imagine a stick-figure version of the Mona Lisa. In there original, there is a background, and there's certainly details of dress and hair and such. How much of that do you try and communicate when you make the translation to stick-figures? I could justify just doing the face alone, since that's all people ever remember.
In any case, it's a difficult issue, one that I don't think I ever fully resolved.
Also, while the series is based on the Rider-Waite set, not all cards are literally interpreted; notably some of the Major Arcanum. Some of the more Christian symbolism has been replaced with more modern symbolism, and instead of a cross, I have chosen the (to my knowledge) neutral infinity symbol. I hope nobody minds. There's also the fact that a cross is easily confused for anything else drawn as a stick figure. So there were some small artistic issues to consider.
Imagine my surprise (and disappointment) to find that this had been done before, and better. His cards, however, are not on the net anymore, which leaves me.
I'm still working on scanning all the cards. Here's a sample:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The original images are indeed 3x5. The images on the main page are reduced 25% in size. I'm thinking that maybe I'll leave those, and modify the links a bit, so as to include the meanings as well. That's a page design decision I'd love your comments on.
The Peanuts Tarot, alas, fell victim to those pesky copyright laws. The Crystal tarot (as created by Crystal) can be found here.